For three years, diversified portfolios played on the other team’s field. Two events late in 2025 suggest that’s beginning to change.
Net model returns assuming a 1% fee. Individual results vary. See disclosures below.
The rally of the past three years has been one of the most concentrated in history, with most stocks outside the Magnificent Seven failing to participate. Even so, most Private Client investors saw double-digit returns in 2024 and again in 2025.
Google and Amazon launched their own AI chips in November, competing with Nvidia. In December the Fed cut rates again and began buying T-bills. The rally has broadened dramatically since — a tailwind for our strategies.
A disappointing 2025, mostly due to the Full Cycle Trend ETF (FCTE). A broadening market should help FCTE return to its historically strong relative performance. For January, the index-switching sleeve moved from large-growth to large-value.
Up 5.9% for 2025 after gaining more than 50% from April 8 through year-end, erasing steep early-year losses. Its metals and mining fund returned 6.8% in December and another 11.0% in the first six days of January.
The best relative performance since the strategy began trading in 2013, up 20.7% — significant because EDAA is the largest allocation in most portfolios. Gold drove much of it, up 64% in 2025 and 117% since we bought in February 2024.
Portfolios are more complex than what SMI recommended a decade ago, by design. Deglobalization, aging populations, stickier inflation, populist politics and a multi-polar world all argue for a broader set of tools.
Dear Private Client investor,
Home-field advantage is familiar to any sports fan. In the NFL, oddsmakers give the home team three points. In the NBA and professional soccer, home teams win more than 60% of the time.
We don’t usually think that way about investing. But it’s a useful lens on the last three years. Since 2023, Private Client portfolios have essentially been playing on the other team’s field. There are good reasons to believe that started to change late in 2025.
Here’s what I mean. During the 2022 bear market, our broad diversification and risk management produced a sizable advantage over the indexes. Then in 2023, as a banking crisis unfolded and conditions looked shaky, the artificial intelligence theme grabbed investor attention and propelled a narrow group of AI stocks sharply higher.
The biggest beneficiaries were already the largest companies in the market — the “Magnificent Seven,” which together make up more than a third of the S&P 500. Because the headline indexes are capitalization-weighted, investors saw a strong market. Breadth was actually unusually narrow.
How narrow?
At one point last year, with the major indexes up double digits, just 18% of S&P 500 stocks were beating the index. More of its stocks were down at least 20% than were beating it.
Over three years, the S&P 500’s 34% cumulative outperformance of the equal-weight index is the widest on record. The prior record was 32%, set in 1997–1999. What followed: the equal-weight index beat the cap-weight index seven years in a row.
Private Client portfolios are built to hold up across a broad range of economic and market scenarios. We don’t want portfolios that excel in one environment and struggle in the rest. We model what works when the economy is growing versus contracting, when inflation is rising versus falling, when bonds move with stocks versus against them.
If you’ve ever looked at your portfolio and thought, “that’s a lot” — you’re right. That complexity is deliberate. It’s how we risk-manage a wide range of possibilities so you can safely meet long-term goals.
The past three years offered no reward for that discipline. Prudent risk management was a drag on returns. We were playing on the opponent’s field.
That’s not to say the portfolios performed poorly. Most Private Client portfolios had double-digit gains in both 2024 and 2025 — and all our model portfolios sit at all-time highs.
Still, our portfolios normally excel on a relative basis when a greater share of stocks, here and abroad, participate in the market’s moves. Broad participation is what highlights our diversification within asset classes and among strategies. Those seven years from 2000 to 2006 were among the strongest relative-performance years SMI strategies ever had.
In mid-November, Google released Gemini 3. New models arrive regularly, so that alone wasn’t news. What mattered was the hardware: Google took the AI lead with a model trained on its own chips rather than Nvidia’s. Two weeks later, Amazon launched an in-house chip of its own.
Until then, the tech giants stayed in their own sandboxes. Nvidia made the chips; everyone else competed on models built with them. Google had search, Amazon e-commerce and cloud, Apple hardware, Microsoft software, Meta social, Tesla vehicles. They largely didn’t compete head-on.
That’s over. Companies in Nvidia’s ecosystem started falling while those aligned with Google soared. The AI trade splintered, and the monolithic Magnificent Seven trade cooled fast. From November 1 to January 6, those seven stocks fell 2.0% while the rest of the market accelerated higher.
At its December meeting the Fed cut rates another quarter point — expected. It also announced $40 billion a month in Treasury bill purchases — not expected.
Some context. The Fed began quantitative easing in 2008, buying Treasury bonds to push long-term rates down and stimulate the economy. Over roughly 14 years of QE in various forms, its balance sheet grew nearly tenfold, from under $1 trillion to almost $9 trillion. Critics argue it did little for growth; nearly everyone agrees it lifted asset prices.
In June 2022 the Fed reversed course with quantitative tightening, letting bonds mature without reinvesting. That brought the balance sheet from $9 trillion to $6.5 trillion before QT ended on December 1, 2025.
Purists will debate whether T-bill buying is “real” QE. The bottom line: nine days after it stopped selling government debt, the Fed announced it would start buying again. There’s a well-established 16-year correlation between Fed purchases of government debt and rising asset prices. We’ve heard “but it’s not QE” before, and the net effect has always been stimulative.
Fed policy is hardly the only thing that matters. But a new rate-cutting cycle generally helps the broad economy — and the broad economy is what drives the stocks that sat out this bull market.
Since November 1 the market dynamic has shifted noticeably. The AI trade reversed while the broader universe of stocks kicked into gear. The equal-weight S&P 500 is up 5.3%; the standard S&P 500 is up 1.8%; the tech-heavy Nasdaq is down 0.6%.
Our models are confirming it. The index-switching sleeve added to Stock Upgrading last year pivoted from large-growth to large-value at the end of December — and value has led growth 6.4% to negative 1.9% since November. FCTE, which buys quality stocks pulling back within an uptrend, has gained 4.6% over the same span.
With more stocks participating, foreign markets, commodities and precious metals all humming, and investors finally looking past the AI narrative, this feels like home-field advantage. That advantage can be substantial. The last sustained stretch like it was 2000–2009, when the S&P 500 posted a negative total return for the decade — and Stock Upgrading gained 85%.
Tap a strategy for the month’s detail.
We’ve spent the last two years refining the strategy mix inside our model portfolios. Last month I walked through why we believe bond investing will be harder in the years ahead than it has been for decades. Those same macro changes — the reversal of globalization, aging populations across the developed world, persistently higher inflation, populist politics, and a multi-polar world order amid real geopolitical conflict — will touch every facet of investing, not just bonds.
So Private Client portfolios look quite different today than what SMI recommended a decade ago. That’s deliberate. Most investors are still running the playbook of the pre-COVID bull markets in stocks and bonds. We think that may prove a costly mistake.
Those changes haven’t shown up in better relative performance yet. But we’ve been playing on the opponent’s field. When that changes, so will the story of our performance against the broad market. That change may have already begun.
Blessings,
This is what arrives in your inbox every month as a Private Client investor.
Plus a portfolio built for your goals, managed by the team that writes it.
For more information regarding the SMI 3Fourteen Full-Cycle Trend ETF (FCTE) or the SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF (RAA), including a prospectus, go to 3FourteenSMI.com. Always read the prospectus carefully before investing in any mutual fund or ETF.
3Fourteen & SMI Advisory Services is an affiliated company of SMI Advisory Services, the advisor to SMI Private Client. The portfolio managers of SMI Private Client also serve as portfolio managers of the SMI 3Fourteen Full-Cycle Trend ETF (FCTE).
The performance results noted above are the net returns from the model portfolio of each SMI strategy, assuming a 1% fee. Investor returns will vary based on their allocations across strategies, level of fees paid, cash flows, and differences in trade timing.
Performance numbers were obtained from a variety of sources, including Bloomberg, Morningstar, Wilshire, Standard & Poor’s and SMI proprietary systems. SMI has deemed all such sources to be reliable, but no guarantee is given as to the accuracy of reported performance numbers.
The Wilshire 5000 total market index represents the broadest index for the US equity market, measuring the performance of all U.S.-headquartered equity securities with readily available price data. The S&P index is an unmanaged index commonly used to measure the performance of U.S. stocks.
The Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based benchmark that measures the investment grade, U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market, including Treasuries, government-related and corporate securities, MBS, ABS, and CMBS.
You cannot invest directly in an index.
Mark Biller is co-founder of SMI Advisory Services and serves as Senior Portfolio Manager of SMI Private Client and the SMI Funds. As Senior Portfolio Manager, Mark has ultimate decision-making authority regarding all portfolio decisions and trading practices. In addition to his duties at the Advisor, Mark has been the Executive Editor of the Sound Mind Investing newsletter for over 20 years. Mark's financial writings have been featured in a variety of national print and electronic media, and he also appears as a financial commentator for various national and local radio programs. Mark has a B.S. in Finance from Oral Roberts University.